Fingers of Blame - The Medium? Or the Message?
May 29th, 2008 Posted in Random Riffs | No Comments »If you haven’t done it by now, you really should join LinkedIn. Terrific website, kind of like MySpace for people with great resumes. Another distinction I’ve heard (somewhat less flattering) is that the difference between LinkedIn and MySpace is that LinkedIn users sit on the other side of the job interview table from MySpacers.
One of the features of the site is that it allows users to toss questions out into cyberspace, to be answered by other users. Questions can be on any number of topics, and are almost always professional in nature.
I spotted a question the other night, written by the development person for a non-profit. He wondered aloud why so many non-profits are focused on events, despite the lack of evidence that they work.
My initial answer follows:
Simply put, non-profits are focused on events because properly executed events work.
I would invite you to check out an annual event called the Jerry Lewis Labor Day Telethon, which raises massive amounts of money for the Muscular Dystrophy Association.
Similarly, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis has generated hundreds of millions of dollars from the “Country Cares” series of radiothons, which are two-day events held on radio stations all over America. Since you’re in Boston, I’d suggest you talk to the NorthEast Regional office of St Jude (located in Boston) for their perspective on how important those events have been to the hospital’s bottom line.
I guess I’m suggesting that your premise is as wrong as it could possibly be. There is a *mountain* of evidence that galas and events work. **If they’re done right.**
Properly executed events are a tremendous way for charitable organizations to make contact with *new* donors, and provide the launching pad for the donor cultivation which you seem to suggest is at odds with doing events.
What doesn’t work is a poorly conceived event, or one that requires an extraordinary amount of work for very little gain. Golf tournaments leap to mind as events that are enormous drains on manpower, and do little to help the charities develop relationships with new donors.
My experience over the last 20 years of doing events with non-profits is that successful organizations combine events with the hard work of cultivating a donor. An event alone accomplishes very little. Done right, events are the best way to establish a relationship to cultivate.
Immediately afterward, the original poster clarified his question, by suggesting that the types of events I was outlining were peer-focused, or the solicitation of funds *was* the event.
My answer:
My *only* experience has been with high-profile events. When I talk about St Jude Radiothons, I’m not talking about a PBS Beg-A-Thon where people you’ve never heard of claim that if you don’t cough up money they’ll put a bullet in Elmo’s head…I’m talking about events where in the middle of a shopping center on a busy Saturday, you can’t get within a mile of the place because Garth Brooks is inside talking about how much he loves the hospital. The events I suggested are ones that make extensive use of media partnerships - which is really the only effective way to do any kind of an event, unless you’re fond of preaching to the choir - and hook people with the event itself, and while they’re at the event, coincidentally provide a compelling message.
The United Way will tell you that in markets where I’ve done events for them, half the money that gets donated comes from people who they say they would never be able to reach, and never be able to get interested had the event that we created for them not happened (paraphrasing, but that’s *their* description, not mine).
Solicitation should **never** be the event. Ever. The event should be so compelling on its own that people are excited to get to the part where they can hand over the money.
What became clear to me is that the original poster wasn’t prepared to have his perceptions shattered; too often, we become convinced that because something didn’t work for *us*, it doesn’t work. I’m reminded of my days as a copywriter, confronted by a client who guaranteed that radio commercials don’t work. A respected member of his local chamber of commerce, he was the type of man that when he spoke, people listened.
I asked him how he knew radio didn’t work. “Simple,” he said. “I offered a 10% discount to anybody who mentioned the ad, and nobody ever mentioned it.” I suggested he try a different strategy. “Let’s do this,” I said. “Why not tweak the offer, so that if people mention the ad, you’ll buy them a new car?”
The silence was deafening.
“Are you crazy?” he replied in disbelief. “I’d go out of business in twenty minutes! I can’t afford to do that!”
Suddenly he realized what he had said, and a light went on. It wasn’t the medium. It was the message. If you do an event, and it doesn’t work, it’s because something was wrong with the event. Maybe it was because you sent email blasts to the wrong people. Maybe it’s because the venue has a bad reputation, or the date was inconvenient. Maybe your event was just plain boring. Ask Jerry Lewis if events work as fundraising opportunities. Ask the United Way if their televised 9/11 event was successful for them.
Simply put, we get the success our events deserve.

Jay Thomas is the Music Director and evening host on XM Radio’s “Highway 16″, where he features the best in country’s hottest new music.